The Union of Filipino Socialists (BISIG)[1] on the MoA AD Issue and the Mindanao Question

August 26, 2008

This recent, the entire country is gripped by the issue of the Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) concerning the Bangsamoro people’s rightful claim of their Ancestral Domains (AD) and the Bangsamoro Judirical Entity (BJE). The issue was so explosive and emotional that it regretfully aroused misplaced passions, renewed prejudices and unnecessary violence on an otherwise opportune moment for progressive forces much more the democratic left to discuss, popularize its concepts and give necessary illumination to the enduring Mindanao predicament which many view with wrong assumptions and understanding.

We believe the Mindanao Question is a complex problem. It is so multifaceted that it is almost impossible to decipher it in a simplistic manner. However, while we believe understanding and political clarity are the most basic necessities as of the moment, we also deem it necessary that these must be arrived through intelligent, democratic, far-reaching and dispassionate discourse.

This paper is a contribution to such an exercise.

The Right to Self-Determination

Marx’s famous dictum “workers have no countries of their own, only a world to win” has been the battle cry of the revolutionary working class all around the globe and the foundation of its internationalist struggle and solidarity. It clearly distinguished revolutionary socialism from the pitfalls of superficial nationalism and its tendency towards social chauvinism and fascism as well as the concrete class interest of the proletariat and the broad masses from that of the bourgeoisie.

However, this does not mean the left movement outrightly dismisses national oppression because it is opposed or a hindrance to the international accord of the workers. We believe in this present situation, the concept of nations and countries are a reality that must be dealt by the forces of change and not esoterically ignored in exchange of “unadulterated class struggle” as espoused by “super leftists.”

While we believe in class struggle, we also believe a nation oppressing another nation will never be free and will instead be a hindrance to the emancipation of the working people and our important work of socialist construction. Thus, the right to self-determination or the right to independence, the right to free, political secession from the oppressing nation is a just struggle of all nations.

This must be dissociated from the false postulation provided by the likes of Vice Governor Pinol, the Lobregats, the Makati Business Club (MBC) and the elite politicians that self-determination is a Pandora box which will open a sovereign state like the Philippines to unnecessary partition. This line of argument is shallow and flawed as it is designed to confuse and sow fear rather than enlighten.

The struggle for self-determination is but the rationale political expression against national oppression as experienced by a legitimate nation or a group of people comprising such categorization. The Bangsamoro realm is such an example.

Nationalism of the Oppressed Vs. Nationalism of the Oppressor

In a capitalist setup, it is true that each country is divided by class, its antagonisms and the state-which while representing predominantly the interest of the ruling class must also obtain the support of “the ruled.” This can be done through force or by consent. Included in “consent” is a narrow appeal for a backward nationalist sentiment as in our case, advocated by the so-called anti- chop chop elite opposition based in Manila which is conveniently being re-echoed by the local elites in Mindanao.

Hence, we must make a distinction between the fake nationalism of the tyrants and the nationalism of the oppressed. This is an imperative not so much because we want a better form of nationalism but because we are not prone to accept the superiority of one nation over another. On the contrary, we struggle for equality of all countries and such scenario can only happen by recognizing the right of oppressed nations to self-determination.

This is a necessary first step in uniting the working people of the oppressed nations with that of the oppressor nations towards socialism.

Bangsamoro: A Defiant and Proud Nation

While the Bangsamoro people are now a minority in Mindanao, this was not always the case. Any critical student of our history will know that long before the Spanish colonizers came; our sister and brother Muslims already have a sophisticated level of governance, sense of nationality and a blossoming culture. In fact, a large part of Manila was under Moro rule like Manila and Tondo. This was long before Comrade Andres Bonifacio and the revolutionary Katipunan imagined a Philippine nation outside of the feudal Spanish crown. If only the Spaniards came in a little later, then maybe we will discuss a different history-a history perhaps without Spain.

In fact, three centuries of Spanish rule did nothing in subjugating the Bangsamoro people which resulted to a desperate conclusion from the conquistadores that the Moro people were in fact a different nation. As of 1896, when the Philippine revolution took center stage, there were in fact two nations struggling against Spain, the then emerging yet besieged Philippine Nation and the unconquered Bangsamoro Homeland.

The American colonizers also shared the same sentiment. The Kiram-Bates Treaty is a proof of this fact. While it may be seen by some as a compromise by the Sultanate of Sulu, the American forces known for their arrogance and triumphalism also yielded, thereby, preserving not only the Bangsamoro realm but also getting virtual admission from the Americans of the existence of such a nation.

It is only the superior weaponry of the US, their brutal wars/massacres coupled with legalized land-grabbing, political and economic disenfranchisement using unknowing Filipino settlers as sanctioned by the then colonial Filipino government which turned the tide against the Moro people and which eventually led to their dislocation from their own land.

The Ancestral Domain and the Memorandum of Agreement (MoA)

For the longest time, the main mode of the Bangsamoro people to reclaim their homeland is through armed struggle. The Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) are the expressions of this form of struggle. While it is a just and legitimate struggle, it however claimed a regretful 120,000 lives and displaced thousands.

That is why the MoA between GRP and the MILF is somewhat a breakthrough not only because it elevated to a higher level the Moro people’s right to self-governance and determination, more so, it is also a peaceful political rectification of the flawed annexation of their nation to that of the Philippine republic.

For the very first time, the imperial government of Manila will recognize the Moros as a people with distinct territory, history, culture and struggle; will recognize their war of national liberation against colonial rule as just and legitimate.

Furthermore, the MoA proposes a governance framework while not fundamentally creating an independent nation as it only grants associative relationship with the Philippine Government; nonetheless, is a necessary first step and a political tool by the Moro people in the realization of a nation of their own. Yet again, it doesn’t automatically mean that the MoA is outrightly tainted or worse a “treason” of the Bangsamoro’s cause. Lest we forget, this did not fall squarely at the laps of the Moros. It was a product of a determined and just struggle.

However, the bogus Arroyo regime as always has other intentions such as prolonging its stay to power via charter change while using the MoA as conciliation with the US Government. Worse, the Arroyo Regime might use the current state of hostilities to introduce martial rule.

In this predicament, the left movement together with the broad masses must dismantle all of Mrs. Arroyo’s ambitions to extend power beyond 2010 by tinkering with the present constitution or by flirting with fascist rule. In the immediate, we must smash the renewed aspirations of the Arroyo regime to lengthen its rule using the MoA or the Bangsamoro people’s legitimate struggle.

The United States and the Specter of Imperialism

On the other hand, it is also out-and-out absurdity on our part not to see the United States’ hand in this juncture. Truly, imperialism is well and alive in Mindanao as it is in many parts of the world.

Without doubt, the United States is making plans in asserting itself as the “peacekeeper” and “protector” of the “newly-carved territory” to advance its political, economic and military interests. For one, Mindanao is militarily strategic to the US. Much more, it is rich in natural resources-resources like oil, greedy private corporations want to have a hand on.

BISIG strongly cautions our Moro sisters and brothers of such dangerous interests in the periphery. While we respect the right and the struggle for self-determination, we strongly assert that the United States and the bankrupt Arroyo Regime cannot become legitimate instruments and political conveyors to achieve genuine and lasting peace.

War, Peace and Atrocities

We also strongly condemn the atrocities committed against non-combatants and civilians. Likewise, we denounce the armament of civilian volunteer organizations fanning the flame of a pseudo Christian-Muslim war. While war might be an outcome of a legitimate and popular struggle, our long experience taught us that a purely military solution has only escalated conflicts, misunderstanding and un-peace. We maintain, the resolution of a question such as Mindanao can be mainly achieved through a political and economic solution.

Thus, we enjoin the MILF and GRP to offset the growing peace deficit by respecting the dignity of life and human rights by implementing an immediate cessation of military actions and by continuing with the peace process.

Equally, we remind the public not to let their emotions, prejudices and biases be the central configurations in an issue which has now become a national public discourse. We should do away with the anti-Moro propaganda of the reactionary media and the dim-witted statements of supposed enlightened politicians who do not know better.

Socialism, Secularism and the Bangsamoro Homeland

For the longest time, socialism was always deemed to be at the side of secularism. The socialist tradition debunked institutionalized religion and faith as bastions of reaction, “the opium of the masses.” The basis was that religion for the longest time was a source of conservatism, of clerico-fascism as people were taught by elite-controlled institutions of hegemony such as the church to fully entrust their destinies to a supernatural being that emphasizes powerlessness and justifies exploitation.

However, through the years, a section of today’s contemporary religion and faith have been advocating for radical change in the “material world” which they believe must be duly realized the soonest possible. Our brand of Socialism recognizes that progressive faiths can be a force of change. Example of this is the radical section of the Christian faith that struggles to free the gospel from its bourgeois class fetters by linking faith with revolutionary struggle. The anti imperialist stance of progressive Islam is another yet, different example.

Without doubt, Socialism and the Moro struggle are not incompatible concepts and perspectives, much more the Moro people’s aspiration for an independent homeland with that of the emancipation of the Filipino working class from the rule of capital. We both aim for a better world, a better society and a truly lasting peace for all.

However, it can only happen by aiming for the abolition of global capitalism and by aspiring for the strategic abolition of the current political and economic dissection of the working peoples of the world which in turn will create a just and pluralist socialist society.

Then maybe, maybe then, the new people of the new world with new perspectives and values will come close to each other once more and celebrate their optimum freedom, democracy and justice.

We are All Moros

If there is one thing this juncture has taught us is this; a thorough, critical and an alternative review of our history will point us to the fact that the modern “Filipino insurgents” of the contemporary Philippine state fighting capitalist exploitation have much in common with the Moro insurgents rightfully struggling to reclaim their homeland. Both were deprived of their sense of nations, both were subdued and exploited by foreign colonizers; both are fighting for genuine independence, peace and freedom.

In a sense, we are all Moros. Not just because we share the same historical Malay origins, but more importantly, we are all Moros because we share the same pain of losing our sense of nation and the joy of rediscovering once more our own respective national aspirations. Without doubt, the struggle of the north and the south are tied in an uncoincidental political umbilical cord of struggle.

The right to self-determination is a struggle close to the heart of socialism. It is not an alien concept. These ideas were first put forward by Karl Marx on the question of England’s oppression of Ireland. He rightfully saw the “profound antagonism” between the Irish proletariat and the English proletariat. This antagonism among the English workers he said was artificially nourished and fanned by the British elite. Marx saw this as the underlying antagonism, the secret of maintaining its oppressive power over Ireland.

While the said countries’ experience is different from ours, the same thing can be said of the Mindanao question. In the final analysis, the relatively free working class of the Philippines cannot completely claim freedom not even under a society geared towards socialist democracy unless the working people of the Bangsamoro people are equally free. Furthermore, the Filipino working class cannot unite with the Moro working people and the rest of workers of the world in defeating the unjust global order unless the Moro people are free as represented in the immediate by an independent Bangsamoro homeland.

Prospects and Challenges

The current issue while complex also presents the democratic left with an important opportunity for engagement. The fundamental challenge is to contribute largely in building a stronger and wider peace consensus involving all stakeholders in order to attain a truly democratic solution to the Mindanao problem.

In the same way, we must bring down the discussions on ancestral domain and right to self-determination down to the communities not only to allay fears and dispel myths, but more importantly to empower the people; so that they will have collective ownership over their future which had been denied to them by succeeding governments and the status quo.

The very issue itself addresses the very core of a national question that any nation and its peoples must grapple. This is the challenge the Democratic Left, Moros and Filipinos alike must face.

26 August 2008

[1] Also, the Bukluran sa Ikauunlad ng Sosyalistang Isip at Gawa (BISIG)


Turn the Economic Predicament into a Political Crisis!
Abandon the Unpopular Gloria! Abandon The Detested Capitalist System!

*Statement of the Union of Filipino Socialists (BISIG) on Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s 8th State of the Nation Address (SONA)

Today, Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, the make-believe president of a make-believe strong republic will deliver her 8th State of the Nation Address (SONA) as provided by a constitutional mandate to annually report the country’s current state of affairs.

However, instead of giving the people an accurate accounting of the country’s circumstances under her leadership, the public was treated to an orgy of untruths, fabricated achievements and hallucinating visions of grandeur. Using a combination of intimidating statistics, rent-seeking politics and dole-out measures, for the last eight years, Mrs. Arroyo together with her cabal of paid hacks and capitalist apologists tried to paint a rosy economic picture amid the backdrop of increasing hunger, poverty and a growing democratic deficit.

There is no reason this SONA will be different from the previous ones. Like her previous annual reports, this SONA will be a continuing distortion of the actual political and economic realities experienced by the people.

“The Dream is Over”

Nonetheless, the Arroyo regime’s penchant for lying may yet prove to be its much-awaited downfall. While the exposition of economic superficialities, of supposed GDP growth, of curbing the fiscal deficit and a strong currency may have temporarily satisfied the inquisitiveness of a doubting public, Mrs. Arroyo’s “final fantasy” and “bubble economy” burst in the face of an unrepentant global financial crisis.

With this, the seemingly slumbering masses numbed and calloused by failed popular uprisings-Edsa upsurges which were always hijacked by the elite, are slowly showing once more its previously proscribed anger to this inutile and illegitimate government. Furthermore, disenchantment to a way of life as prescribed by a social system that does not deliver on its promises of economic bliss and prosperity is sweeping society like an uncontrollable plague.

Truly, under the climate of a crippling economic crisis composed of unmitigated oil price hikes, food insecurity and unregulated energy charges, the Arroyo regime’s development paradigm is exposed for what it is truly is; fundamentally flawed, elite-driven and crisis-endemic.

Enter Populism

And how did Malacanang react to this undeniable economic crisis? By manufacturing spectacles and scaffoldings of imaginary government support and increased subsidy. In short, resorting to populist but negligible measures which won’t make a dent in giving people ambulatory relief to the pains of the ongoing economic transgression.

Some may argue that there is nothing wrong with populism as it is defined as the practice of advocating the rights, virtues and/or perspectives of the common people. Surely, the left movement had its share of populism. We agree. However, it becomes erroneous when it becomes the definitive solution to complex soci0economic problems which necessarily entails comprehensive and structural resolutions. Much worse, populism becomes outrightly reactionary when it is practiced to defend a blatantly corrupt regime or system and to desensitize the public’s consciousness and mind-set to revolt or aspire for change.

This is precisely what the Arroyo regime has been doing since the crisis erupted.

While offering an assortment of dole-outs such as the 500-Peso lifeline support for poor electric consumers, tuition moratorium to state schools, cheap NFA rice and this recent, a rollback of oil prices, these same measures are being used to defend anti-people policies like RVAT by saying the dole-outs were made possible through this regressive form of taxation. Lately, ill-prescribed conditionalities such as oil deregulation were also being defended while preaching the “good news” of economic palliatives.
Accurately speaking, economic palliatives will only serve as impediments to the development of genuine solutions to the crisis.  It will also drain our country of much-needed resources while promoting patronage politics among “rulers” and dependence on dole-outs among the “ruled.”

The Bankruptcy of Neo-liberalism: The Illegitimacy of Capitalist Hegemony

These days, it is becoming fashionable to blame every imaginable wrongdoing to the Arroyo regime. Although this government is culpable for many of our current socioeconomic ills and will surely pay for all its shortcomings and crimes to the people, we must not discount the fact that the current economic model as preached and promoted by this regime is equally to blame.

As fast as the Arroyo regime was stripped of its “superb economic management, capitalism and its latest stage, neo-liberalism are suffering from a dual crisis of legitimacy and viability. The current economic crisis is not only a product of Mrs. Arroyo’s pure economic misgovernance, more importantly; it is the result of the global crisis of contemporary capitalism.

Due to the chronic crisis of overproduction of capitalism, for the last 25 years, capitalism was overrun by the massive expansion of the unproductive sectors of the capitalist economy resulting to the international liberalization of finance. This ushered in the golden age of what we know as neo-liberal globalization. So to speak, we are currently under the epoch of less and less production and more and more of fictitious capital governed by the unproductive forces. Real capitalism has just gone unreal.

The end result, for the last 25 years or so, the capitalist system ran under fictitious capital, capital that is not real because it is not based on profits made by the productive forces (workers) but the result of squeezing profit and extra value from existing profits without the benefit of producing new value. In due time it collapsed as established by the recent United States’ nightmarish subprime crisis which eventually turned into a global financial calamity which sooner or later exacerbated the already exploding oil and food crises. Truly, as Marx said: “the barrier to capital is capital itself.”

Patriotic Responsibility and the Class Role of the Revolutionary Agent

Funny as it may seem, this analysis is being shared by the Arroyo regime, at the same time, remaining loyal capitalist apologists. Her economic managers argue that it is unfair to blame the government for the multiple economic crises as the problem is an international phenomenon suffered by all nations. Yet, while this line of argument is convincing to the untrained and unsuspecting, it is escapist as it absolves itself of any responsibility and flimsy as it stands on clay.

It assumes that capitalist globalization is by itself a supra-state, the last government standing, the destroyer of nation-states. However, the truth of the matter, governments did not diminish under the “open regime” of globalization. In fact, they remained major players, enforcers and parties of the current capitalist model. WTO, IMF, World Bank, the G8 and many more capitalist instruments are all products of governments.

Thus, the local elites of developing nations using reactionary governments are the principal enforcers for the production and reproduction of capitalism.

For this reason, the role of Mrs. Arroyo in this unending economic nightmare is clear. Hence, the ouster of the bogus Arroyo government is an imperative. The economic crunch felt by many Filipinos must be transformed into a direct political crisis confronting the illegitimacy of the Arroyo regime.

However, the immediate ouster of this regime will not essentially guarantee fundamental and radical changes. A simple ouster will not fundamentally rock the foundations of capital. That’s why it must be stressed that the Oust Gloria struggle is a patriotic duty of all Filipino citizens sick and tired of this regime. Conversely, a patriotic duty not only calling for its ouster but more importantly, pushing for a new and democratic government of the true sovereign-the masses.

This is where the political accord of the patriotic duty of the broad and the class role of the revolutionary agent must be stressed.  We call for the establishment of a Transitional Revolutionary Government (TRG) which will break the back of elite rule, widen and institutionalize democratize space and build the necessary impetus for an uncompromising political revolution-a socialist revolution of the working people-the revolutionary agent which can send capitalism to its graveyard with the solidarity and participation of the broad masses.

Dislodge the Old, Create the New: Build the Conditions for a Socialist Revolution

What we are witnessing perhaps is the slow demise of neo-liberalism and the continuing decomposition of global capitalism. More than ever, we maintain, no amount of self-rectification and creativeness will save capitalism from its inevitable total collapse. In the final analysis, the global capitalist crisis can only be best understood through socialist analysis. The same thing that it can only be fundamentally resolved through socialist solutions.

Therefore, let us turn the crisis into a revolutionary opportunity. Now is the best time that the contradictions of capitalism are best exposed to the masses; A time of crisis of capitalism in the recent history that can be easily understood by the masses-a crisis that threatens the very lives of the people from the worst effects of neo liberalism on the economy, gender, environment, culture and lives of every individual. Let us build the conditions to create the new society of the new people. Let us abandon the old, build the new and usurp the future.

Let’s start with the Arroyo regime. Let us finish the Arroyo regime.

End the Crisis! Oust Gloria!
Establish the Transitional Revolutionary Government!
For a Socialist Philippines! For a Socialist World!

July 28, 2008

Patalsikin ang Gahaman, Magnanakaw at Abusadong Rehimen!

Wakasan ang Elitistang Paghahari!

Itayo ang Gobyerno ng Mamamayan at Hindi ng Iilan!

Umaalingawngaw ang sigaw ng taong bayan. Sobra na! Tama na! Palitan na! People Power Na!

Bilang na ang oras ni Gloria sa Malacañang. Sa pagpapatalsik kay GMA, dapat na tiyakin na magiging hakbang ito para ganap na wakasan ang paghahari ng iilan. Hindi dapat matapos sa pagpapatalsik kay GMA ang laban. Bagkus, ito ay isang hakbang para sa tuloy-tuloy na pakikibaka ng sambayanan para sa ganap na katarungan at kaunlaran sa ating bayan.

Ugat ng krisis: Paghahari ng Iilan

Titiyakin ng mga kapwa niya elitista, kasabwat ang Estados Unidos, na kung mapalitan man si Gloria ay maipagpapatuloy ng papalit sa kanya ang mga kasalukuyang patakarang pang ekonomiyang pumapabor sa interes ng mga malalaking negosyante at dayuhang kapital. Ganito ang nangyari noong Edsa 1 at 2. Kaya imbes na guminhawa, lalong naghirap ang nakararaming Pilipino. Huwag tayong pumayag na ito’y maulit.

Bagamat malaking problema ang korapsyon sa pamahalaan-na siya ngayong mitsa ng krisis pampulitikang kinakaharap ni Gloria- alalahanin natin na hindi lamang ito ang dahilan ng pampulitika at pang-ekonomiyang krisis na patuloy na nagpapahairap sa nakararaming Pilipino.

Pabor sa iilan ang patuloy na pag-iral ng neoliberal na patakaran ng globalisasyon- liberalisasyon , pribatisasyon at deregulasyon ng ating ekonomiya. Sa liberalisasyon ay tiba-tiba ang mga importer ng mga produkto mula sa ibang bansa habang bumabagsak naman ang mga lokal na kapitalista at industriya. Sa pribatisasyon ay nagkakamal ng yaman ang mga kapitalistang kakutsaba ng mga nasa pamahalaan upang magpatakbo ng mga batayang serbisyo tulad ng kuryente, tubig, ospital, paaralan, transportasyon telekomunikasyon at iba pa kung saan ay pangunahing apektado ang mga maralita sa lungsod at kanayunan, mga kabataan at mga kababaihan. Sa pagbebenta ng mga ari-arian ng gobyerno ay patuloy ang demolisyon sa mga maralitang tagalungsod upang bigyang daan ang mga proyekto ng gobyerno.

Pabor sa iilan ang patuloy na pag-asa sa pangungutang sa mga dayuhan bilang estratehiyang pang ekonomiya. Dahil dito ay patuloy na lolobo ang mga ilehitimong utang – mga utang na hindi kinakailangan at may bahid ng korapsyon at anomalya. Isa lamang ang ZTE deal sa napakaraming kaso ng ilehitimong utang tulad ng CyberEducation deal, Northrail and Southrail Project, BNPP, at marami pang iba. Sa patuloy na pag utang ay mas patuloy na nabubundat ang tiyan ng iilan habang ang mamamayan ang pumapasan ng pagbabayad sa mga naturang utang. Halos 70% ng badyet ng pamahalaan ang napupunta lamang sa pagbabayad ng utang. Ngayong taong ito lamang ay magbabayad tayo ng 623 Bilyong Piso sa interes at prinsipal ng ating utang na umaabot na sa halos 4 Trilyong Piso!

Pabor pa rin sa iilan na manatili ang patakaran ng kontraktwalisasyon sa pagtatrabaho at ipako sa mababang halaga ang sahod ng mga manggagawa upang mas malaki ang kita ng mga kapitalista; ang patuloy na mataas na presyo ng bilihin; ang mababang presyo ng mga lokal na produktong agrikultural habang patuloy sa pagpapapasok ng mga dayuhang produkto wala o mababang taripa at quota.

Pagpapatalsik kay Gloria: Isang Hakbang tungo sa Sosyalismo ng Sambayanan

Ang tunay na kaunlaran ng Pilipinas ay mangyayari lamang kung ang nakararaming mamamayan ay may mapagpasyang  boses at kontrol sa pagdedesisyon sa mga patakarang pang ekonomiya at pampulitika ng ating bansa. Isang lipunan na ang gobyerno ay prayoridad ang paghahatid ng batayang serbisyo at pagpapaunlad ng lokal na ekonomiya. Isang lipunan na ang mga manggagawa ang nagpapasya sa produksyon, direktang namamahala ng mga pagawaan at nakikinabang sa kita ng pabrika o industriya; libre and edukasyon serbisyong pangkalusugan at iba pang esensyal na serbisyo; patakarang panlabas na malaya sa dikta at kontrol ng mga dayuhan; may sapat at disenteng trabaho para sa lahat; may epektibong boses sa pamamahala at pakinabang ang lahat ng kasarian, edad, o etnikong grupo sa yaman ng bansa.  Ito ang diwa ng sosyalismong Pilipino. Ito ang pangarap na dapat sama-sama nating itaguyod at mapagtagumpayan.

Alam nating sa ngayon ay pangarap pa rin ito at hindi ito mangyayari sa kagyat na  mapatalsik sa poder si GMA. Ito ay isang patuloy na pakikibaka. At ang pagpapatalsik kay GMA ay isang hakbang tungo dito. Iwasto na natin ang kamalian ng Edsa 1 at 2. Dapat na tayong matuto. Ang palitan ay ang sistema. Hindi lang ang namumuno. Neo-liberal , kapitalista at elitistang sistema ang problema. Sistema ang baguhin- kung nais natin ng tunay na pagbabago.

Alternatibo sa Krisis ng Pamamahala: Gobyerno ng Mamamayan

Matunog ang pangalan ni Noli de Castro bilang konstitusyunal na kahalili ni Gloria. Siya ang gusto ni Cory at mga negosyante, maging ng U.S.Wala daw bahid ng korapsyon. Wala namang sapat na kakayahan upang mamuno at tiyak na neoliberalismo din ang itataguyod nitong mga patakaran.

Hindi rin dapat balewalain ang interes ng mga maka-kanang Heneral sa  AFP upang isalba ang krisis na ito mula sa oposisyon at mga progresibong grupo sa pamamagitan ng kudeta. Panunupil at pandarahas ang tiyak na magiging resulta ng isang rehimeng militar kayat dapat na ilantad at itakwil ang ganitong maniobra.

Samantala, ang  mga tradisyunal na pulitikong (trapo) tulad nila Villar, Roxas, Legarda, De Castro, Gordon, Bayani,  at iba pa ay kanya-kanyang pagpapasikat na ang ginagawa ngayon pa lang upang makaungos sa visibility at name recall para sa eleksyong 2010. Si Jose de Venecia naman ay walang kredibilidad na manawagan ng pagpapatalsik kay Gloria dahil bistado namang kaya lamang siya bumaligtad ay dahil hindi sila nakinabang sa ZTE at “inilaglag” na siya ng administrasyon.

Ayaw na natin sa trapo. Panahon na ng pagbabago.  Dapat nating isulong na itayo ang isang transisyunal na gobyerno na bubuuin ng batayang sektor at mga progresibong lider. Maraming lider na may kakayanang mamuno sa atin na hindi pulitiko. Ito ang dapat ipalit sa kasalukuyang rehimen at kagyat na maglunsad ng mga repormang elektoral at pulitikal;  mga programang kagyat na iibsan ang hirap ng mga Pilipino; at unti-unting babaklasin ang mga patakarang neo-liberal at anti-mamamayan.

Panahon na upang angkinin ng mamamayan ang kapangyarihan. Hindi natin dapat hintayin ang simbahan o mga sikat na lider upang manawagan ng pagbabago. Tayo ang nakakadama-mga ordinaryong empleyado, manggagawa, mga kababaihan, mga walang trabaho, estudyante at kabataan, magbubukid, propesyunal at maliliit na negosyante. Tayo ang dapat mangunang kumilos-para sa ating mga anak at susunod na henerasyon.  Nasa atin ang bilang. Nasa atin ang lakas.  Makiiisa,  lumahok  at  manindigan upang:

  • Patalsikin ang Gahaman, Magnanakaw at Abusadong Rehimen!
  • Itayo ang Gobyerno ng Mamamayan!
  • Patuloy na makibaka para sa Sosyalismo ng Sambayanang Pilipino!


Pebrero 29, 2008 / Lungsod ng Makati  / email:

Statement of
Chairman, Laban ng Masa

We deplore the arrest of Jose Ma. Sison. The self-righteous glee of the National Security Adviser in his TV appearance exposed the sinister involvement of the Arroyo administration in this sordid affair. (more…)

magdalo.pngmagdalo.pngmagdalo.pngmagdalo.png TRILLANES, PAGLINGKURIN!

Statement of Unity

23 August 2007

It is not Senator Antonio F. Trillanes IV on trial today. The Senator has already been vindicated by the vote of the people.

On the docks today is the prevailing political system, dubiously dubbed as a “democracy” but incapacitated by the tyranny under Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. (more…)

A position paper prepared  by IDEALS   (Initiatives for Dialogue and Empowerment through Alternative Legal Services )      

            Thirty-one separate agreements. More than one million hectares of agricultural land. Private Philippine corporations with questionable legal personalities. A serious threat to Philippine food security. Prejudicial and unconstitutional terms. (more…)


The recent appearance of Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr., son of the late strongman before the Sandiganbayan as a ‘hostile witness’ for the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) raised not only a few eyebrows but has signaled PCGG’s complete and total decay. (more…)